Propeller Calculator

Estimate static thrust, induced velocity and tip speed from shaft power and diameter using simplified momentum theory.

100% FreeNo sign-upPrivate — runs in your browser

Estimate static thrust, induced velocity and tip speed from shaft power and diameter using simplified momentum theory. Simplified momentum-theory estimate, not a manufacturer performance chart.

—

Static thrust estimate (N)

Static thrust estimate (N)
—
Induced velocity (m/s)
—
Tip speed (m/s)
—
Tip Mach number
—
Disc area (m²)
—
Copied to clipboard

How to use this tool

1
Enter shaft power

Power delivered to the propeller in kilowatts.

2
Enter diameter and RPM

Diameter in metres and rotational speed in revolutions per minute.

3
Enter air density

1.225 kg/m³ at sea level; lower at altitude.

4
Read thrust and tip speed

Thrust is a static (zero forward speed) estimate; tip Mach warns about compressibility losses.

Formula & worked example

Actuator-disc momentum theory (static): induced velocity vi = (P / (2 × ρ × A))^(1/3), thrust T = 2 × ρ × A × vi², disc area A = π × (D/2)², tip speed = π × D × RPM / 60.

Power 100 kW, diameter 2 m, 2,400 RPM, sea-level air: disc area 3.1416 m², induced velocity 23.51 m/s, static thrust ≈ 4,254 N, tip speed 251.33 m/s (Mach 0.733).

Limitations — read this before you rely on it

This is a simplified momentum-theory estimate for static thrust only — it is not a manufacturer performance chart. It ignores blade geometry, pitch, tip losses, forward speed and compressibility effects, so treat thrust as an order-of-magnitude estimate for design comparison, not a certified figure.

Frequently asked questions

Real thrust depends on blade airfoil, pitch distribution and tip losses that momentum theory averages away.

Thrust falls as forward speed rises because the inflow velocity through the disc increases.

Above about Mach 0.8–0.9 the blade tips lose efficiency and become very noisy due to shock formation.

Yes for static thrust — a larger disc accelerates more air more slowly, which is more efficient for the same power.

The same theory applies at small scale, but low Reynolds numbers and small-blade effects make drone results rougher.